Time and Capital: Understanding the Cost of Winning Investors
Your time is finite, make it work for you.
When your fund lands a $100m allocation, it's champagne time. The celebrations are well-deserved, but here's the counterintuitive truth many funds miss: understanding what it truly costs to secure that capital could be your most powerful competitive advantage. The best friend of LTV (Investor lifetime value) is CAC - Client Acquisition Cost.
The Paradox of Big Raises
Key Takeaways
When landing a $100m allocation, understanding what it truly costs to secure it creates powerful competitive advantages
Non-monetary costs—particularly investment team time—often represent your largest but least measured fundraising expense
A simple one-month tracking experiment reveals acquisition inefficiencies without implementing burdensome systems
Measuring channel-specific CAC often shows that intuitive assumptions about efficiency are incorrect
Quarterly CAC reviews transform fundraising from an art dependent on heroics into a systematic, scalable process
When you land that $100m+ allocation, the acquisition costs can seem inconsequential. After all, spending $250,000 to secure an investment of that size looks like an excellent bargain—just a few months of fees for what could be a five-year relationship or longer.
But this perspective misses the point. For most funds, tracking Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) is about optimisation and scalability. Understanding which channels and approaches deliver the most efficient investor acquisition allows you to:
Scale your fundraising more efficiently
Deploy your most precious resources more effectively (especially investment and senior team time)
Create sustainable, repeatable growth processes rather than relying on heroic efforts
Most hedge funds track performance meticulously yet operate with remarkably little visibility into the true costs of acquiring investors—a blind spot that hides significant inefficiencies and missed opportunities.
Looking Beyond the Next Raise
While most teams focus exclusively on the next raise, future-focused teams understand the cumulative impact of acquisition efficiency. A 10% improvement in CAC compounds dramatically over a five-year growth trajectory.
More importantly, the insights gained from understanding your true acquisition costs create a foundation for scalable growth, transforming fundraising from an art form dependent on individual heroics to a repeatable, optimisable system. It makes the $10m investments as efficient as the $100m - spreading your investor risk, reducing concentration risk and increasing your network effect.
The question isn't whether you can afford to understand your true acquisition costs—it's whether you can afford not to.
What CAC can do for you
The alternatives industry faces unique challenges that make CAC particularly relevant:
High-value team diversion. When your CIO spends 20 hours preparing for and attending investor meetings, that's 20 hours away from managing the portfolio. This opportunity cost rarely appears in fundraising calculations.
Misaligned incentives. Sales teams incentivised solely on assets raised may pursue inefficient channels if the true costs remain hidden. CAC creates accountability for efficient capital raising.
Resource allocation dilemmas. Should you hire another salesperson, engage a third-party marketer, or invest in thought leadership content? Without CAC data, these decisions lack an objective foundation.
Competitive differentiation. As performance convergence continues across strategies, operational excellence—including fundraising efficiency—becomes a competitive advantage.
The Non-Monetary Costs: Your Most Valuable Resources
The non-monetary costs often represent the most precious resources consumed in investor acquisition:
Investment Team Time This represents perhaps your most valuable asset—time that key investment personnel spend away from generating returns:
CIO/PM involvement in pitch meetings and due diligence calls
Investment analyst preparation of custom analysis for specific prospects
Strategy specialist participation in technical discussions with potential investors
Operational Resources These costs are distributed across departments:
Legal and compliance review of investor materials
Operations team time spent on due diligence questionnaires
Technology resources devoted to investor onboarding
Middle and back office preparation for investor operational due diligence
Intangible Assets Some resources are difficult to quantify but nonetheless valuable:
Intellectual property sharing through educational content
Reputation capital deployed in referral requests
Network access leveraged for introductions
A Simple One-Month Experiment
Rather than implementing complex tracking systems, consider this straightforward one-month experiment to reveal your true acquisition costs:
Select a sample period. Choose a typical month in your fundraising calendar. A month is roughly one cycle and is not too arduous to track. Make it next month, it doesn’t need to be too complicated.
Create a simple tracking sheet. Gather information for
Team members involved
Approximate hours spent
Direct expenses incurred
Ask key team members to log their investor-related time. Get everyone to briefly describe what they did and how long it took: “35mins - call with xx family office about portfolio risk,” “1:45 wrote investor newsletter.” Focus on your most valuable resources: CIO, PMs, and senior sales staff. But don’t forget those up and downstream people hours - they add up fast! You can even co-opt a junior to help track your senior staff.
Capture direct expenses. Travel costs, event fees, sales and marketing software. You can even account for office space and hardware if that makes you happy.
At month's end, calculate your preliminary CAC. More about this further down.
This lightweight approach requires minimal behavioural change yet provides immediate insights that most funds lack entirely.
Quarterly Insights, Not Daily Tracking
Some funds enjoy tracking everything, as if they were lawyers. Having been a consultant who occasionally tracked to the second, I see the positives and negatives. Many teams don’t want another daily administrative burden and will obstinately refuse to implement tracking. Instead of fighting a losing battle, consider making CAC a quarterly strategic exercise led by your Chief Growth Officer or equivalent. This cadence provides strategic insights without imposing operational headaches.
A quarterly CAC review can include:
Analysis of which channels delivered the most cost-effective investors
Assessment of investment team time allocation to prospecting activities
Identification of process improvements to reduce non-monetary costs
Refinement of targeting to focus on more efficient investor segments
This approach transforms CAC from an operational burden to a strategic advantage without demanding constant attention from your team.
The CGO Difference
This is precisely where a Chief Growth Officer adds distinctive value and it would be remiss of me not to highlight it! Rather than burdening your investment and operations teams with tracking and analysis, a CGO can:
Design lightweight measurement approaches that capture essential data without disruption
Convert raw data into strategic insights that drive resource allocation
Implement process improvements that reduce acquisition costs while enhancing investor experience
Create feedback loops between acquisition efficiency and targeting strategy
Many funds engage Fractional CGOs specifically to lead these initiatives, providing sophisticated growth expertise without the commitment of a full-time executive hire.
Finding your Meaningful Metrics
The true value of tracking CAC comes from segmenting and analysing the data in ways that reveal actionable insights. Simply calculating an overall average provides limited utility. Here are the most valuable ways to dissect your acquisition costs:
Allocate Activity
Firstly, you have to allocate all that activity. Take all those scrappy notes and categorise them across multiple different buckets:
Channels - get as granular as possible here: cap intro, TPMs, direct outreach, PR, outbound marketing, inbound inquiries, etc
Phase of the pre-investment process - awareness, prospecting, engagement, due diligence, closing etc
Department - not complicated, allocate your CIO’s activity to ‘investment.’
Function - sales, marketing, operational support, legal and compliance etc. (I add function as well as department because your sales support could be devoting a lot of time to compliance, and your CIO could be spending outsized effort on sales)
2. Extend your data
Now you need to do some messy estimating based on your month’s data to make it reflect a year’s worth of activity - it’s not so much regression analysis as educated guessing. Use your monthly data, diary and fund flows to estimate the time you’ve spent. Talk to your team about the effort they put into events and trips (and then add 50%. Almost without exception we underestimate how much effort we put into travel and events.) Also take into account the natural ebb and flow of the asset-rising year - July and August are quiet, October and November are frantic, December feels exhausting, but that’s because teams fit 4 weeks of work into 2.5, not because they’re significantly more productive.
3. Attribute fund flows to channels
Next, your job is to allocate fund flows to channels, which may mean you need to look over your CRM for the last three years. For example, did that family office get introduced at a cap intro event? Or would you say they only booked to see you because they had received your newsletter for 18 months? But, hang on, they only got onto the newsletter list based on direct outreach from one of your team two years ago. Which one of those channels gets the attribution? If nothing else, the exercise will galvanise your resolve to track your channels!
For now, if you want to get a baseline, you’ll need to invent some rules. E.G. I only attribute direct outreach if it was within 6 months of the investor’s move to the engagement phase. So in the example above, I’d attribute both the cap intro event and outbound marketing (particularly if they’d received more than a basic newsletter). *Importantly, recognise that your attribution decisions may affect your team’s behaviour. If they know direct outreach doesn’t get attributed after 6 months, you may see a huge uptick in sales calls to maintain attribution! You need to let your team know this is a work in progress and doesn’t affect their bottom line - it’s about optimising, not creating negative behaviours.
4. Investor type
This is a difficult one to allocate unless you’ve had significant fund flows across investor type within a reasonable timeframe. Without that, you won’t have enough data to draw true inferences. Your target investor type changes over time and investors only become an equal opportunity when your AUM is into the multiple billions. If you’re lucky enough to be in this elevated group, get analysing. Whatever your size, it’s worth setting up the processes to track this in the future. Within a few years you will have useful data relevant to you and your products.
There are a wealth of outliers and exceptions. I make clear exceptions for managed accounts and flows through wealth platforms etc. as they’re related to product type. Even if your flows from a wealth platform are coming into your main fund, the CAC and LTV is easily attributable and definable and thus easy to compare with your traditional investors. On the other end it gets murky when looking at consultants, especially when their business models are so disparate. Where do you allocate CAC when the work you’ve done has been through a consultant, who advises on some portfolios, has a direct mandate with others and acts as a quasi ratings agency for another pool? It’s not a simple task (it’s why I recommend using a Fractional CGO - but of course I would!)
Universally useful metrics
1. Channel-Specific CAC
Breaking down CAC by acquisition channel reveals where your efficiency truly lies:
Cap intro events: Total costs (including preparation time, travel, event fees etc) ÷ investors acquired
Direct outreach: (Sales time + investment team time + support) ÷ investors acquired
Inbound inquiries: (Marketing costs + response resources) ÷ investors acquired
Third-party marketers: (Base fees + success fees + support costs) ÷ investors acquired
This analysis often reveals surprising inefficiencies. A channel that seemed cost-effective may look very different when all resources are accounted for. Cap intro events seem intuitively efficient; however, on a purely CAC basis, it may be surprisingly expensive, not least in investment team time. Having the information doesn’t mean you shouldn’t go to cap intro events! But it may mean you need to assess your strategy for attending, increase exposure and use other channels to optimise the event. Conversely, you may realise that increasing targeted outbound marketing at a relatively low cost increases inbound inquiries and reduces time to investment, thus CAC (this is the case, almost without exception).
2. Time-Based CAC Components
Breaking costs into time phases reveals optimisation opportunities:
Prospecting phase: Resources spent identifying and qualifying potential investors
Engagement phase: Resources devoted to active pitching and education
Due diligence phase: Resources supporting investor evaluation
Closing phase: Resources dedicated to finalising terms and documentation
This breakdown often highlights surprising resource drains. Perhaps your due diligence phase consumes disproportionate investment team time that could be reduced through standardised materials for different investor types - rather than standard across the board.
3. Functional CAC Attribution
Understanding which functions consume resources helps identify process improvements:
Sales effort: Direct sales team time and expenses
Investment team involvement: CIO/PM/Analyst time devoted to prospecting
Marketing resources: Content creation, events, thought leadership
Operations support: Due diligence responses, data room management
Legal and compliance: Document reviews, regulatory considerations
Many funds discover that investment team involvement represents their largest cost component, even though intuitively, most teams believe the sales function is the most resource-heavy.
4. Temporal CAC Analysis
Tracking how acquisition costs evolve over time provides strategic insights:
CAC trends: Rising or falling over quarterly periods
Seasonal variations: Higher costs during conference seasons that may not translate to higher acquisition
Market cycle impacts: CAC differences during volatile versus stable periods
Fund lifecycle effects: How CAC changes as AUM grows
This longitudinal view helps identify whether your efficiency is improving and how external factors impact your acquisition costs. (Again a good argument for a Fractional CGO!)
Extracting Actionable Insights
The true power of these segmented CAC metrics comes from the insights they generate. Here are key analyses that drive meaningful improvements:
CAC Efficiency Ratio
Calculate the dollars of AUM you secure for each dollar spent on acquisition:
AUM Acquired ÷ Total Acquisition Cost = CAC Efficiency RatioThis simple ratio allows you to compare efficiency across channels, investor types, and time periods. A higher ratio indicates more efficient deployment of resources.
Investment Team Leverage
Measure how efficiently you're using your most valuable resource:
AUM Acquired ÷ Investment Team Hours = Investment Team LeverageThis metric reveals whether you're maximising the impact of limited investment team time. Significant variations across channels may suggest process improvements.
Conversion Cost Analysis
Break down costs by conversion stage to identify inefficiencies:
Cost per Initial Meeting → Cost per Second Meeting(s) → Cost per Due Diligence → Cost per AllocationThis funnel analysis often reveals surprising drop-off points where resources are being consumed without proportional returns.
CAC Amortisation Period
Calculate how quickly acquisition costs are recovered:
Total Acquisition Cost ÷ Annual Management Fees = CAC Amortisation Period (in years)This metric helps contextualise acquisition costs against the expected investor relationship duration. A shorter amortisation period indicates a more efficient acquisition.
Real-World Impact: Beyond Numbers
Understanding your true acquisition costs leads to practical improvements:
More efficient use of investment team time. When you recognise the true cost of your CIO's involvement in early-stage prospects, you can develop more efficient qualification processes.
Better channel selection. Perhaps cap intro events seem cost-effective until you factor in preparation time and travel—while targeted content marketing might deliver qualified inbound inquiries at lower total cost.
Improved investor targeting. Some investor segments may have significantly lower acquisition costs than others, even controlling for allocation size.
Process optimisation. Identifying workflow redundancies in investor materials or due diligence responses can substantially reduce operational costs.
Want to explore how a Fractional CGO could help implement lightweight CAC analysis for your fund? Let's discuss a tailored approach that delivers insights without operational burden.
Take a look at our other articles that cover advanced growth
